On the front cover of her book, SUZAR tells us that "Ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall blow your mind". This contrasts to the words written in the bible: "You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free". Thereby hangs a dilemma. Does Suzar want to blow people's minds or set them free? My presumption is that she seeks to set the chained minds of Africans free.

When one looks at the contents, this is divided into two books. The first, running from chapter one through to seven, sets out to expose the greatest cover-up in history or rather His-Story. the second look at Quantum Deception and Effective Mind Control in the name of "the Lord". The contents lists the detailed breakdown of the chapter so that, if one does not have time to read its three hundred and eighty pages, then one can read a chapter or section/s of a chapter - chapters - in which one is particularly interested.

But this book poses a real dilemma for seekers of truth. One also assumes that SUZAR is also in a dilemma. She tells us that "We got a fraudulent Bible, fraudulent God, fraudulent Christ from Masters of Fraud who working for the Deceiver. The fraudulent story of the fraudulent Christ is to derail, distract and rob us of the true story of the real Christ" (p178). However, SUZAR does not tell us the true story and thereby hangs the real dilemma of this book.

There are a great deal of historical facts in this book which people ought to know. The bibliography is quite impressive with one exception that SUZAR should be aware of. The book entitled "The Historical Jesus and the Mythical Christ" attributed to Gerald Massey was put together in the United States from different writings by Massey. It does not contain the lecture of that title given by Massey around 1921. I was thinking of Massey's lecture as the centrepiece of a book on the African Origins of Christianity together with a critique of Paul Boyd's "African Origins of Christianity" when I saw the American concoction. Despite the fact that Massey is anti-Christian. Anyone seeking the origins of Jesus, the Christ would discern it in Massey's lecture.

In her book SUZAR implicitly accepts that the original religion of the Kamites (ancient Egyptians) is based on the precession of the equinoxes. She states that African (with a 'K') cosmology is the root of all religion, that the zodiac is the central theme of the bible. I wonder why she did not look for IU EM HETEP, God the sun who was crucified, burned and resurrected in the zodiac.

Her arguments for accepting a physical are unconvincing. I do not think it is enough to say that "I believe". Belief does not have a role to play in a book about historical facts. It is no good telling us what "was likely". Conclusions must be based on the facts amassed or derived from the facts. I do not know how one feels the truth.

I found her discussion of the zodiacal aspects of the Bible eye opening. This means that I have to go back and study these new aspects that she has brought to attention. Being a frequent reader of the revelations of St. John, the Divine, one is aware of the relationship between Kamite astronomical mythology and aspects of Christian theology. I have argued in one particular lecture that the foundation of Christian theology is based on the precession of the equinoxes since Christianity is rewritten Kamitic theology founded on the study of astronomy.

Since SUZAR accepts that "Christianity is reworked Egyptianity", I do not understand her critique of this religion which she call a tyrannical counterfeit. Other tyrannical counterfeit religions are Judaism, Islam and Hinduism. If one accepts that a people's religion is a glorification of a people's culture, though one can criticise any people who adopt an African religion to suit their particular culture, I would say that that represents imitation as a form of flattery.

For me, Christianity is the glorification of African culture. It is a version of the ONE TRUE RELIGION which began, if we are to believe Herodotus, in old Ethiopia over 20,000 years ago and has evolved over cycles of time. So despite Christianity being reworked Egyptianity, it still maintains its African essence. It teaches us to practice Truth, Justice and Righteousness, to Feed the Hungry, Clothe the Naked, House the Homeless, Give Water to the Thirsty, Do what pleases the Gods.

Both the Revelations of Enoch and of St. John, the Divine, tell us that God has woolly hair. Decoding the sign language of the Bible, they are telling us that God is Black i.e. an African. Since all humanity is descended from Africans, there is no contradiction here. Europeans are now freely admitting that they are descended from Africans. So I am somewhat surprised that SUZAR does not deal with the obviously false claim that God was born as his own son and came as a genetic mutant in the age of Aquarius. Is it because this falsehood is being propagated by Blacks? Perhaps, like others, she does not consider the time is right to nail this lie.

I was most impressed with her work on the zodiac. She argues convincingly that Jacobs children, the twelve tribes of Ishmael, the twelve Judges in the book of Kings, the twelve tribes of Israel and the twelve Apostles/Disciples of Christ are all signs of the zodiac. Her etymology on Christ's disciples is quite detailed and shows excellent scholarship. The whole zodiacal basis of the Bible calls into question SUZAR's critique of the Bible and Christianity.

Harsher critics would accuse SUZAR of setting up straw men and then shooting them down. For example, she poses the question "What was the original Bible and who wrote it?" She tells us that the original Bible "was authored by spiral-haired Black African people, apparently priestesses primarily" then goes on to tell us that "in fact, there was probably no such 'book' per se". If there was no original, it could not be rewritten, edited, censored or distorted by Hebrews, the Roman Emperor Constantine or the Khazars who only came on the scene of history yesterday.

Given that this is volume one of a multi-volume book, I hope that in Volume 2 or a subsequent volume SUZAR will produce detailed evidence for some of the claims she makes in this volume. For example, that the African Americans are descendants of the original Biblical Jews, a claim also made by Farrakhan and Ben Ami. I know that all or most of us came from West Africa. Also, her claims that all people of colour who are members of the Christian religion whether conscious of it or not, worship the White man as God. Doesn't SUZAR know that most African Christians have taken down Michael Angelo's uncle from the walls of their churches? I see Christianity evolving back to its African roots and linking up with authentic African religions like IFA but that will only come with the cycles of time and how scholars like SUZAR relate to and interact with her African Christian kith and kin worldwide.

I feel that this book, rather than promoting a dialogue, could alienate Africans who form the majority of Christians world-wide. They would be shocked to learn from SUZAR that the biblical Christ they worship is really Satan, the wolf in Sheep's clothing. Perhaps in elucidating on these things in later volumes SUZAR will explain why the biblical Christ told his desciples to Feed the Hungry, Clothe the Naked, House the Homeless, Give water to the Thirsty.

Ntum ba Azah, London, 1st February 1998

Please note that opinions expressed by anyone are not necessarily those of Global Africa People's Network or Sukisa Publications. Copyright in all documents rests with the original creator.

Send all enquires relating to the above article to Brother Lester Lewis c/o gapnet@globalafrica.com

To make any comments about anything which appears on this site or to submit any documents for publication in Global Africa People's Network (GAP Net) page, just send it in by e-mail: gapnet@globalafrica.com.